Jump to content

Arcurus

Moderators
  • Content Count

    747
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    66

Everything posted by Arcurus

  1. so in round about two virtual days i can pay you!
  2. by the way, i would limit the possible verifications per week... or the max verifications some verificator can make...
  3. to log in with diasbora would be really a great thing (or at least to put some social url of you choice there)
  4. lol yea I forgot, now they got global funny just looked on their website 5 min ago https://timerepublik.com/ lol, you are a mind reader
  5. lol, i deleted facebook two times, the first time when i was going to india, the second time when all this spying stuff came out... By the way its illegal what they do in Germany with not allowing pseudonyms... Of course you can use my picture and name. and you can link also to my diaspora account: https://pod.geraspora.de/people/df0bccf9e0e07505
  6. good luck As far as I know Chiemgauer is tolerated, same like Timebanks, mainly because they stay local....
  7. would llike to have, but how can i pay that if i have no mangos, because i have no facebook :/
  8. great work! can you list also the sum of all donations per person in the people tab? and the list of how many verifications some one got and gave? - Change distribution of mangos and donated mangos according to levels alternatively: list the verifications someone has and use then some kind of liquid democracy platform like adhocracy to vote new members in and cheating members out with a 2/3 majority.
  9. hmmm, the good think is, that I don’t see facebook anymore in the proposal to your questions: No verification lasts forever, when will be a renewal due or how can you fall out of your current verification level again? I suggest every 5 years like in the current mango example. If there are black sheep abusing their verification level, who and how are they going to be suspended from their level? use some liquid democracy platform like Adhocracy to vote on all the stuff. in the beginning you can just use it for feedback, later on if it functions you can even code the liquid democracy logic i
  10. here an suggestion that is based on the average trust instead of levels: https://freicoinalliance.com/topic/183-mangos-suggestion-for-universal-dividend-distribution-with-web-of-trust/
  11. Hi all, here are just some ideas about how an universal dividend / basic income could be distributed with an web of trust: This idea is in an very early stage! This example is based on the MANGO experiment! In short in the MANGO experiment each user get 1 MANGO per hour. To be fair in the long run MANGOS are decaying with 20% per year. To test it 1 second simulates one min. 1 Month simulates therefor round about 10 years. Web of Trust: - people can trust each other analog to friend relationships in social networks - per donated 24 Mangos (DailyIncome) one can create or renew one trust r
  12. by the way, here is now the suggested web of trust with levels posted in an new topic, to discuss it better.
  13. Hi all, here are just some ideas about how an universal dividend / basic income could be distributed with an web of trust: This idea is in an very early stage! This approach with levels is more meant for an game like approach and could be used in unviveral divident games that educate about it. Still would be nice to make experiments with it.. This example is based on the MANGO experiment! In short in the MANGO experiment each user get 1 MANGO per hour. To be fair in the long run MANGOS are decaying with 20% per year. To test it 1 second simulates one min. 1 Month simulates therefor round ab
  14. I understand your argument. In Freicoin with 5% in 23 years 66% of the coins would be redistributed. Analog in 47 years nearly 90%. In one life time lets say 80 years, 98% would be redistributed. That means in one life the system could become very fair with an stable payout per person. Never underestimate the effect of compound interest, or in this case effect of compound demurrage. Further, its good to see the risk involved in holding Freicoins. Currently its not very likely, that Freicoin will become adapted. Therefore the risk is high that Freicoin will loose even further in value. I
  15. To fix it as one Freihour, currently 10 dollar is a workaround in the test phase, and has nothing to to with the protocol...
  16. great! Then a mango would always be an mango Would be great to clone it and make also an second example more with parameters like Freicoin. 100 Million coin supply and redistribution of 5% per year. So that we can make experiments with the differences between them two
  17. But doesnt the amount of howmuch you get per day change in your example if you redistribute 20% of mangos instead of letting them just decay? That I understand quite well. In case of fixed amount of mangos per day and letting them decay everybody will always get the same amount of mangos relative to other participants and relative to time for eternity. And because of the decay as suggested above the relation between mangos given out per and per participant and the total amount of mangos out there will balance quickly. As said I see no need in making it more complicated then needed,
  18. Which formulas? The example demonstration of the formula just shows the increase of money supply with each parameter, but they don’t say which parameter is best or? Just for clarity In the monago example it looks like a redistribution not an inflation of the money like in the demonstration of the formula or? Of course both would have the same distribution effect, but other psychological effects and technical needs. And why if the redistribution is the main part, why then use another fixed mongo parameter like the 10 mangos per day? And the fixed max generated monagos per user? I would m
  19. or simulate Freicoin like with 100 Million units and 5% redistribution or the most simple way dogecoin like with 100 Million units and 5% increase that is redistributed To the more fair in the beginning we could start with 1000 ¨virtual¨ users so the first participant gets 1/1000 of the redistribution not 100%
  20. so for the moment here are my suggestions: increase mongos per day to 24, so that one hour is one mango. destroy mangos instead of redistribute them (this simulates) This would simulate Version 1 (see last post)
  21. long manual to read... can you maybe write the argument for redistribution, or on which site i can find it in the manual? I would make it as simple as possible. Here are different solutions: 1. That means give fixed amount of mangos per user per day and add some rotting (demurrage) Or even simpler 2. Start with some fixed amount of mangos and increase this amount per year with X percent. 3. Or use fixed money supply and redistribute X% per year to all participants (closest to Freicoin model) or 4. Increase the money supply with x% per year and redistribute to all participants From
×
×
  • Create New...