Jump to content

Skaro

Members
  • Content Count

    254
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    25

Posts posted by Skaro

  1. I see a lot of consolidation of foundation funds are being made in the original foundation public keys. Have some funds also been destroyed?

    The explorer API for foundation balance which simply sums funds in and out of foundation keys (including demurrage) shows the Foundation balance around 44 million. 

  2. Well being this is the “Future of Freicoin” thread, it seems it could use a note here.

    With Maaku’s announcement of ‘Forward Blocks’ and the implementation of such tech on Freicoin, a new era in Freicoin is born. The buy wall for FreiExchange has shot up by 4x, and other such financial indications.

    Perhaps now, with the increasing price of Freicoin, @Arcurus can get a phone number and join us on Telegram. With @Mark Friedenbach working obviously on code, perhaps the rest of us need to restart that nagging of what OTHER things are necessary AROUND Freicoin like new mining pools, web apps etc.

     

    To the Moon!

     

    Slides: http://freico.in/forward-blocks-scalingbitcoin-slides.pdf

    Paper: http://freico.in/forward-blocks-scalingbitcoin-paper.pdf

    Video: 

     

    Relevant tweets:

     

  3. Yes, when you click on 'transaction', that view is wrong. I know how to fix it, I just never got around to it. I simply didn't realize it needed adjustment the first time around.

    The public key summary and the block view were what I modified.

  4. But wait. In the above examples, there were 9 transactions in one block. 8 didn't calculate demurrage but the 9th did, in the exlorer. In more recent blocks, the demurrage calculated okay. 

    How could they be different?

    .Also, I thought ABE read the .DAT files directly. I thought that meant it wasn't using an RPC (I have limited knowledge on this poin\t)

    (If you are looking at ABE, the 'blocks'' and 'account' views are correct, but I never fixed the 'transactions' view')

  5. "If we have so much activity across allthe chains such that a single person cannot run a full node on ALL chains using the same PoW, then the whole system can no longer be decentralized."

    Wouldn't that be more decentralized; ei, numerous small groups taking care of their own transactions, like serperate countries, banks, and credit cards today?

     

    Why have seperate chains sharing the same asset? The whole point is to share the work load and only communicate when necessary?

     

    I appreciate of course that you have looked into the details, where I am doing more... beer talk!

  6. @Mark Friedenbach  "via strong federations or higher level protocols using cross-chain payment channels". Is this a solution to crypto scaling problems in itself? 

    Like the present world using different currencies and exchange, 1000 different alt-coins, 1000 different blockchains and miners etc. Thus 1000x more capacity. Then, when you need to pay in another coin, there is an atomic swap?

×
×
  • Create New...