Leaderboard

Agree with @FreedomCare. First logo is too simple, second logo is far too complicated, too many tings mixed up... I would do it similar to the Freicoin Alliance logo

Maybe because enrich the miners is no social cause?

The old one looks too complicated and detailed. You loose the impression at a distant glance. I would drop the 3d and shading on the S. Keep the S in brighter color. Add the new handshake in the background and drop the blue and red swirl around the outer ring. Drop 3d and shadow on the ring too. I would keep the S just a teeny bit more elegant ( like as if it drawn with an ink pen or a quill . It brings movement to it). Use black outline but drop black background. Consider light colours and outline with darker ones. Thank you!

Thanks to Magius for introducing me in this topic, and thanks to everybody for appreciating and helping. A necessary premise, is that in this moment there is in Italy a growing debate about complementary currencies and there are several proposals by political parties. The matter is that the most of this people doesn't have any idea about what they are talking, but it's the mode and so everybody must say it's opinion. The other problem is that the Faz Project is based on a theory, and for understand deeply it's working way you must to study a bit, maybe some more than a bit. The most of p

It's time to re-start this thread. As mentioned in another thread, I've been professionally busy non-stop for some months on a couple of different projects. That is currently slated to change with my new responsibilities including the maintenance of the Elements codebase, which includes most of the new features we would like to add to Freicoin. So there's a little bit of double-dipping there. Plus since I'll be traveling less and working normal hours I'll be able to spend 8-10 hours a week, evenings and weekends, working on the basic plan outlined at the top of this thread. So let's revis