Jump to content
Arcurus

MANGOS - Suggestion for Universal Dividend Distribution with Groups

Recommended Posts

Hi all,
here are just some ideas about how an universal dividend / basic income could be distributed with using groups:
This idea is in an very early stage!

This example is based on the MANGO experiment!

In short in the MANGO experiment each user get 1 MANGO per hour.

To be fair in the long run MANGOS are decaying with 20% per year.

To test it 1 second simulates one min. 1 Month simulates therefor round about 5 years.

 

 

 

Group Trust:

This example is designed, so that it needs no central authority.

Groups need Mangos to be created to limit the creation of groups, give incentives to join groups and to stay honest.

 

- to get the daily mangos one must be member of a Group / Team

 

- each goup can have at max 30 members

 

- per donated 10.000 Mangos (Little bit more then the Mango Income of one year (8640 Mangos) one can create or renew one group

 

- donated mangos are redistibuted to all participants

 

- groups must be renewed every year

 

This would give first usecase to Mangos and test some alternative verification system :)

Second:

- if enough groups are there (for example) 10, then groups must themselves be member of a super group (clans)

 

- each super group can have at max 10 groups

 

- per donated 100.000 Mangos (Little bit more then the Mango Income of one 10 years (8640 Mangos) one can create or renew one super group

 

- donated mangos are redistibuted to all participants

 

- super groups must be renewed every year

 

Third:

 

- if enough super groups are there (for example) 10, then supergroups must themselves be member of a super super group (federations)

 

- the rest is same like super groups, but with 10 times of the needed mangos

 

And so on and so on.

 

Optional:

To support finance itself, per participant another maximal 24 mangos are generated per day.

the group becomes 50% the super group 25% super super groups 12.5% and so on.

Groups are required to make their use of funds transparent.

 

 

Internally groups are free how to mange their members.

 

Externally, all kind of goups can be voted in and out with 2/3 majority.

 

In the begining this could be done with liquid democracy platforms like Adhocracy

 

In short each participant is free to delegate his voting power to another participant or group, or is free to vote himself.

 

per default each participant delegates his voting power to his member group. each group to their super group and so on.

 

 

All the good,

Martin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...