Leaderboard

Enough is enough! ECB is stealing our name: they made ¨freecoin¨ https://bravenewcoin.com/news/eu-parliament-states-virtual-currencies-cannot-be-anonymous/

probarly due to windows drops down to compability mode for older software

Well, my findings is that the code needs to be branched up to a newer core, we are still on 0.8 version off bitcoin. I still have not had time to debug alot as it takes time to build under gitian to get a ok version for 64 bit. 0.10 and upwards contain builds for 64bit on windows. Linux versions build and work ok.

I have currently set up a chatroom based on rocket.chat for use with Freicoin. Join in at http://chat.freicoin.info/channel/Freicoin and take part in current discussions. Cheers Fedde

I can do some testing. My computer skills are not so great as to be able to build a wallet without a dummy's guide, but Im willling to learn and put in the time.

That's a little bit of awesome.

looks quite good, only few addresses have some less than 0,1% difference

Bicknellski, That is exactly what I was talking about yes. Why it happens I'm not exactly sure. The old wallet was still adding blocks and diverging on another chain. So I suppose the wallet was simply unable to reconcile previous transaction. But my question to you is: since, 32 bit applications are supposed to be able to run on 64 bit Windows is you computer an AMD machine? Mine is. I thought that may be the problem.

Thx to fedde we have now: https://freiexchange.com/login

Well, not the only one, FreeRoosterCoin also

Sorry for the hickup, i need to move this to a new server one of these days when i have some time to do it.

UPDATE: old nodes that are not aware of an higher existing tier can just continue to validate transactions as they always did. Updated nodes, that are aware of an higher tier, but do not have enough resources to be a full node on a higher tier, could if they want take part in the active enforcement of higher tear transactions in the following way: - they could download the full or a part of the current balances (unspent set) from higher tier nodes and block transactions / blocks that are not valid according to that - if they dont have the current balances they could ask higher t

Hi all, here is a draft, how the current blocksize could be increased though using a soft fork similar to segwit. Please outline my errors if you find some. All the good, Arcurus Introducing extended blocks: - like with segwit an extended block is used to have extra space - these extended block is referenced from the normal block - transactions can be either stored in normal block or the extended block - the old block plus the extended block is not allowed to be bigger then the new extended block size - so called extended transactions that ca

Here a draft that includes also a dividend (basic income) to all members (I like the distribution, because it has the golden distribution rule 1 / 5): POW + POS + POM (proof of member) example: Transaction fees plus demurrage coins plus not yet distributed coins are distributed the following way: 20% goes to proof of work block creators at max (this number is not set in stone and could be reduced if the blockchain is successfully secured with other methods). 20% goes to stake voters 20% goes to member voters 20% is assigned to projects according to the stak

92.93% growth in price.

Ok, it is not exactly like fiat money. But i see what is happening today and lay it on this model. If there is a monthly inflation in prices of 1%, the prices are rounded to the next higher cent. 1.05,- would end up as 1.07.- not 1.06.-. For small businesses this makes no big change but for large it makes a real difference. So as fast rising prices are too confusing for most people and the big corporations will profit more. The result is inequality and rising prices that are slowly eating up the basic income like inflation in fiat money slowly dissolves loans. Summarized: Using inflation

why is grantcoin fiat money? Yes grantcoin will lead to rising prices, but not necessarily this gives advantages to big corporations. As long as the newly created money is given directly to the people, the people have the most benefit and cannot be dried out like in the current interest / debt based system or in an gold like system which will ultimately again lead to a interest / debt based system, because it accumulates with time.

No. but doing some new tests on p2pool after the softfork as now from what i see there is no tx to foundation and the blocks are more normal. Will report back