Arcurus

@Adilado have you also interest to support Freicoin in the longer run other than just investing?

? --> to clarify, i propose to bring the foundation coins in circulation as block reward and combine it with a softfork that makes sure that some part of the block reward is used for Freicoin related projects. The softfork is enough if enforced by the main Freicoin economic nodes. For example, create time locked transactions that spent (100% as fee) of the foundation coins over a three year period with unlocking one transaction every 10 minutes. Then add a softfort: the main economic Freicoin nodes enforce that a certain part of the block reward is send to a specific

@Adilado welcome to Freicoin. What brought you to Freicoin? Have you read what Freicoin is about or do you just search for coins to invest in? Currntly in Freicoin the situation is this: the core developer of Freicoin became core developers of Bitcoin, since then they are super busy. Freicoin 0.9 is ready to be used thx to @fedde, but is still under testing. @Rik8119 wants to port Freicoin code to 0.14 Currently there is a discussion how we proceed with the Freicoin Foundation that holds 80% of the coins. It looks like that the foundation coins will be

still i dont think that it is a necessity. take your example above. if the transaction is included in a year, it must so or so must pay the demurrage for this whole year on top of it. so what is the benefit to have information when the transaction was sent? if the sender did not pay the demurrage in the original transaction the receiver could pay it (through child transaction pays for parent transaction) if he wants the transaction to be included. so where is the need to have a separate ref height other then when the transaction was included in the block? actually it does not matter if th

what exactly is the benefit of having a refight? In the end what counts is the block where the transaction is included. who pays the demurrage is the same question who pays the transaction fee. That should be like in Bitcoin totally up to the agreement between sender and receiver. In Bitcoin either of them or none of them can pay the fee if they want, so why not in Freicoin?

hi rik, if you solidar update to 0.14 please consider that most likely we dont need to have a refhight in the transaction. this could simplify the code a lot.

i thought about it. i would go along with option two if we combine it with a softfork, that allows to redistribute some part of the block reward other than mining. In away it would be enough if the main Freicoin clients (currently this are mainly feddes nodes (exchange / mining pool)) runs this softfork, so we could change it easily without the need to change all nodes if we want to update the redistribution mechanism. the softfork could be that easy like this: the main Freicoin nodes enforce that a certain part of the block reward is send to a specific address if less the

+1 for me just having demurrage is not what inspired me to support Freicoin I invested in Freicoin with the promise that i could use these to get donation matching to encourage to support further projects. i understand that you want to close down the foundation. but simply increasing the mining reward and therefore inflate the coins it not what was promised. if you want to bring the coins into circulation do that now and not in a constant drain through mining. i don't see how higher mining rewards will benefit the coin, more coins means simply less price per coin. if

as @Rik8119 said option 2 is not fair to investors.

Option 3 some months after the matching is done. UPDATE: I see no use in having just more coins for mining. Just more coins does not mean more security, because increased supply will most likely reduce the price so that security wise it stays the same. I propose to bring the remaining foundation coins after matching is done in circulation as block reward and combine it with a softfork that makes sure that some part of the block reward is used for Freicoin related projects. The softfork is enough if enforced by the main Freicoin economic nodes, so that it is easy t

at this point i would not recommend to add Freicoin to any other exchange. if we dont have enough volume we will loose again the Exchange. Coinmarketcap also dosnt display the Freicoin trading volume right... I would concentrate on first updating the Clients and bringing projects like trading rewards, universal divident new clients etc to run.

i guess, that drop is just because of the Chinese government forcing the exchanges to be honest with their trading volume. Coinmarketcap says, that there is 1 Billion Bitcoin trading currently which is a lot! https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin/#charts

for Solidar, i guess in the beginning its mainly advertisement and a clear vision to get it started. Also you should think about giving some incentive to hold some coins. Like interest up to double the universal dividend. Same incentive is also missing in grantcoin. Also of course a exchange is needed and an experience of price increase can help lot.

Freicoin can function if the 5% demurrage is used to encourage circulation. like outlined in the freipay proposal. Then you have an incentive to use Freicoin.

currently many of the crypto tokens seem overrated. Many coins had a tenfold the last months. many coins are just junk. tons of ipos got tons of millions. daily millions are burned for mining fees. bitcoins growth is artificially limited with the blocksize. federal reserve is increasing interest on dollar. summer hole for investments (june to october)... People need money for holidays.... coinbase collapsing because of too many users.... bitcoin miner vs developer vs industry vs users.... crazy world.... its fully unclear what is happening.... crazy times....

what i still see lacking, is a basic incentive to hold some Grantcoin, if i would be them i would require to have a certain amount of grantcoin to get the full universal dividend. or to volunteer x lets say 10 hours each month to comon good projects.

Wow, we have a Manna (Grantcoin) Community - Forum! So lets write the first post here! As you know i like very much the idea of a universal dividend and advocated for it even before we started Freicoin. Therefore i happen to support also Manna (Grandcoin) one of the first universal dividend community. How does it function? ¨Each year, we (the Manna Foundation) plan to add 3.5% to the Manna already in circulation. This will be given as Basic Income grants to everyone in the world who chooses to participate, growing the money supply in a way that provides equal access to all

great! Wow Freiexchange is mentioned three times

@fedde is/ was working also on a Webwallet to distribute Freicoins directly to verified people.

Hello Freicoiners, here is a now a more detailed early draft of how a decentralised budgeting / coin issuing could look like. This proposal is designed that way, that it can be used as second layer on the current Freicoin chain, similar to a soft fork. This draft does not have the Freicoin community consensus yet, and is therefore considered to be treated as my suggestion only. This proposal is based on the Freinode proposal. Therefore i please you to read this proposal first: Layer 2 Part 2 – coin issuing to projects: Decentralized Freinodes based coin issuing Introducin

Hello Freicoiners, here is a now a more detailed early draft of how a Freinode / proof of stake based layer two could look like. This proposal is designed that way, that it can be used as second layer on the current Freicoin chain, similar to a soft fork. This draft does not have the Freicoin community consensus yet, and is therefore considered to be treated as my suggestion only. If you dont agree with poof of stake (POS), i still please you to read this proposal. After that i would like if you could add your arguments pro / con here. Just to mention, this proposal uses POS on

I dont understand what you and maaku don't like at POS? Even this proposal is not a full POS proposal, it uses pos in a second layer. The fall back is still pure POW. So on the end we have still the same POW security, that is based on the economic value of the block reward given to the POW miners (sadly very low currently in Freicoin) Also the POS is not pure POS, it is freinode based and it is drawn by POW. Therefore it does not allow to sign for two different chains at the same time. I'm open for arguments, but simply saying POS is bad i don't agree. Even still we do

Early Draft Freicoin 2.0 lesson learned From people for people! Hi Freicoiners, here is an early draft how Freicoin could look like if we would redesign it from the beginning. This draft does not have the Freicoin community consensus yet, and is therefore considered to be treated as my suggestion only. The proposal is structured that way, that it can be implemented step by step whichever part gets a consensus from the Freicoin community. Freicoin 2.0 is structured into three layers. Layer one would be similar to Bitcoin / Freicoin like it is now and is proof

lol, if im using Ehtereum.... not that much yet.... i guess i have to try to get out my sunken Ethereum classic from the broken DAO.... quite some money worth now....

@Bicknellski maybe this would be something for your children: 4. We’re developing a Grantcoin savings account program for children in developing countries. Our team is drafting a proposal to present to two charities, one in Africa and one in Latin America, which have already expressed interest. We hope to expand the program to more charities in the future.