Jump to content

Bicknellski

Freicoin Alliance
  • Content Count

    483
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    84

Reputation Activity

  1. Upvote
    Bicknellski reacted to Rik8119 in [WORK_IN_PROGRESS] FreiExchange   
    and given the low sell pressure it could be even more if we make the coin sustainable and get a useful redistribution in place..
  2. Upvote
    Bicknellski reacted to Arcurus in [WORK_IN_PROGRESS] FreiExchange   
    looks like some 1000% in less than one month. But still very low volume. I really hope that we bring the coin distribution to run
  3. Upvote
    Bicknellski reacted to fedde in [WORK_IN_PROGRESS] FreiExchange   
    Update 10/9-2017
    New design added Minor bugfixes Chapta addon Forgotten password reset Minor improvements Working on some more changes the next few weeks. Any bugs, please report on [email protected] so i can add to the worklist.
  4. Upvote
    Bicknellski reacted to fedde in [WORK_IN_PROGRESS] FreiExchange   
    We are listed on Coinmarketcap
    https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/freicoin/
  5. Upvote
    Bicknellski reacted to fedde in [WORK_IN_PROGRESS] FreiExchange   
    There was a mixup in topic link that pointed to the old beta site. It has been changed and beta site has been disabled.
  6. Upvote
    Bicknellski reacted to Skaro in [WORK_IN_PROGRESS] FreiExchange   
    maybe you're putting in the wrong password...
  7. Upvote
    Bicknellski reacted to fedde in [WORK_IN_PROGRESS] FreiExchange   
    Yeah, at least now in the testing fase. I am doing a few changes during the next days on the display of trades in your "dashboard" so we will see how that work out.
  8. Upvote
    Bicknellski reacted to fedde in [WORK_IN_PROGRESS] FreiExchange   
    Lovely morning everybody. Progress is going forward.
    - Fixed changepass
    - Few more bugs in trading fixed
    - Design changes (footer etc)
    - Some security issues has been sorted out
    We are still in beta, keep that in mind.Do not fire off large qty of coins to the exchange. As always, it's not your bank
  9. Upvote
    Bicknellski reacted to Rik8119 in Testing Freicoin 0.9   
    Very good question. I never did it, but @jtimon said they already started.

    The configure --with-incompatible-bdb was doing Ok on my server though it gave the error that something was wrong with serialize.h in line 789 during compiling..
  10. Upvote
    Bicknellski reacted to fedde in Testing Freicoin 0.9   
    Just a question @Rik8119
    How much work to port it to a newer Base?  Like the freicoin-0.14 branch ? 
  11. Upvote
    Bicknellski reacted to Arcurus in Testing Freicoin 0.9   
    Hi rik, i managed to bring .configure to run for 0.9 but got stuck while compiling it.
    Fedde opened now an issue for that on github:
    https://github.com/freicoin/freicoin/issues/27
    Jorge said that he will look into that, so i guess its best to wait until we get some feedback.
    For bringing .configure to run, i had to follow the instructions of the build manual for unix and install all the dependencies mentioned at the bottom of the file, like the Database library and the boost framework manually. But now i got stuck during compilation.
    If you want i can help you on unbuntu to bring the .configure to run. For the other issue i guess its best to wait for response from jorge or maaku.
  12. Upvote
    Bicknellski reacted to Rik8119 in Testing Freicoin 0.9   
    Ok my bad, the installation routine changed to:
    ./autogen.sh ./configure make I installed autogen, but it is still giving me some errors at ./configure
  13. Upvote
    Bicknellski reacted to Rik8119 in Testing Freicoin 0.9   
    So, Acurus wrote that 0.9 is ready for testing and i tried to compile on Lubuntu.
    First it has no makefile unix to compile, so i coppied it from freicoin 0.8 - it started to compile but give me an error:
    In file included from net.h:18:0,
                     from alert.cpp:9:
    util.h:102:2: error: #error missing boost sleep implementation
    after i uncommented the error in "inline void MilliSleep(int64_t n)" in line 102 in util.h ( the error:
    No rule to make target obj/bitcoinrpc.o  obj/leveldb.o
    comes up. i had that error earlier, so this is maybe not connected to the update..
    Rik
  14. Upvote
    Bicknellski reacted to Arcurus in [Draft] Freicoin Roadmap   
    yes jitmon said 0.9 is long long time ready to be tested.
  15. Upvote
    Bicknellski reacted to fedde in [Draft] Freicoin Roadmap   
    I favor to get the p2pool code fixed as it would be the easiest way to distribute and for new users to set up that want to run a pool.
    There is of course other alternavies (nomp, unomp , mpos etc etc) but those are single site pool. I rather see a p2pool network that can work togheter to secure the network itself. 
    Also, the 0.9 code. I see last commit, 25 july 2016. Thats a looong time ago.
  16. Upvote
    Bicknellski reacted to Arcurus in [Draft] Freicoin Roadmap   
    After talking with fedde how important it is to fix p2pool i put it up higher in priority. Who ever wants to lay his hand on that feel very welcome. If needed we can also set a bounty for that.
    After talking with jitmon: 0.9 is ready to be tested and community is more than welcome to test. If needed we can also set a bounty for testing. 
  17. Upvote
    Bicknellski reacted to Arcurus in [Draft] Freicoin Roadmap   
    Hi Freicoiners,
    here is a draft for a Freicoin roadmap.
    As always feel free to give your feedback,
    Martin
     
    Main Goals:
    - encouraging fair distribution and access to money
    - encouraging a Frei Economy based on the common good
     
    Short term:
    - Get started with the Freicoin giveaway
    - having p2p pool work
    - Having updated Freicoin clients
    - Restructuring Freiexchange as easy to use wallet (sending coins internally per name or per address) 
    - Moving the Alliance Funds to somebody who wants to take care of it. I would nominate Skaro or Rik.- having updated Freicoin websites
     
    Mid term:
    - having a simple Freicoin web store to sell things
     
    - extending the Freicoin giveaway
    - outlining a clear concept for decentralising the coin issuing and moving towards proof of stake / proof of member
    - outlining what is to be done with the current Foundation coins
    - considering a soft fork to issue some part of the demurrage in other ways
    - considering switching to a Freicoin unique mining ALG
     
     
    Long term:
    - switch to proof of work / proof of stake combination or implement second masternode layer
    - implement budget / voting structure 
     
    Long long term:
    - implement proof of member (one verified active member one vote)
     
    Done:
    - setting up FreiExchange
    - Blockexplorer calculating demurrage
  18. Upvote
    Bicknellski reacted to Arcurus in 3 more weeks until initial issuance is complete   
    can we jump to 14 directly without 0.9?
    51 Min.vor 19 MinutenGesendet     since 0.9 and 0.10 mostly just need testing,why not?
    but yeah, teh next rebase we plan to do to 0.13 or 0.14 directly
  19. Upvote
    Bicknellski reacted to Arcurus in 3 more weeks until initial issuance is complete   
    libgmp and libmpfr are specific to bitcoin
    but we want to reuse things from elements in freicoin if te community wants it
    Diese Nachricht melden Diese Nachricht löschen 4 Std.vor 4 Stunden   I want to help with rebasing to 0.14 and moving the foundation. web out of heroku mostly, probably improving it
    4 Std.vor 4 Stunden
  20. Upvote
    Bicknellski reacted to Arcurus in 3 more weeks until initial issuance is complete   
    As said i wasn't able to conpile myself, but freicoin/0.9 is te branch that needs testing in the bitcoin repo
    2 Std.vor 2 Stunden   yeah, i forgot we still need to mobe fron 10 to 100% matching...
    that's important
    2 Std.vor 2 Stunden   rewarding distributing demurrage in other way than as aubsidy to miners, would be nice, republicoin or something. Whatever the mechanism, if it is acceptable for p2p, it is acceptable for theany funds we still need to distribute from the foundation, so first that
    2 Std.vor 2 Stunden   i don't think distributing demurrage by "community vote" is acceptable, but whatever te proposal, should be tried with foundation funds first
    2 Std.vor 2 Stunden   once a month donation matching, yeah, we should have started that long ago
    for testing, 0.9 has been there for testing for long
    2 Std.vor 2 Stunden   great! So as summary, you look into the donation matching so that it is done with 100% at least once a month. we look into testing 0.9
    what would be great to have is a version to test that at least the main developers can compile, i dont know if we will otherwise manage to compile....
    12 Min.Gesendet     with distributing the demurrage, i for my part fine with that to wait if we manage to bring the current donation matching to run.
    11 Min.Gesendet     what would be great to have is to experiment with distributing one part lets say 100.000 coins per month directly to projects according to the donations (vote) they got. For example if one project has 10% of the donations for this month, it gets 10.000 coins.
    7 Min.Gesendet     if we bring these two distribution mechanisms (donation matching / and vote distribution) to run at least once a month and have updated wallets, i think then the whole community is very happy.
    5 Min.Gesendet     by the way, nice to talk to you it seems, like we can really move forward with Freicoin!
    Diese Nachricht löschen 20 Sek.Gesendet  
  21. Upvote
    Bicknellski reacted to Arcurus in 3 more weeks until initial issuance is complete   
    i posted the conversion also in the alliance forum, so that others can read it
    16 Min.Gesendet     in the longer run many in the community would want to have that some part of the demurrage is distributed to projects. The easiest way to implement it would be to make it like the current foundation. Like 20% to miners and 80% for projects. This part would be great to have distributed regularly through community vote. To start with the voting must not be done at the blockchain itself. I guess that Rik would be willing to help this implement.
    8 Min.Gesendet     these 3 basic things is what would be great to have:
    1. once a month a small life sing and update how we can help testing.
    2. once in a month donation matching.
    3. distribution of demurrage funds based on the community vote. For example 80% of the demurrage like we had with the freicoin foundation.
    Diese Nachricht löschen 1 Min.Gesendet  
  22. Upvote
    Bicknellski reacted to Arcurus in 3 more weeks until initial issuance is complete   
    I managed to reach jitmon on twitter:
    for the giveaway, I would prefer that is done through the donation matching program, just another project with 100% matching or something, but that's my opinion
    1 Std.vor 18 Minuten   rewarding rebases, absolutely, I'm already doing some preparations for 0.14 and 0.13, but mark did a rebase to 0.9 and that's has not been tested or reviwed yet
    I wasn't able to compile it myself
    1 Std.vor 16 Minuten   but it's there, moving to 0.9 would be an important step in the right direction but we really need more help with testing from the community
    1 Std.vor 15 Minuten   for me it's easier to use irc and the mailing list but I will look it up. Please remind me if I forget again
    1 Std.vor 13 Minuten   I'm on vacation without the computer but I will make an account if I don't forget
    sorry that we're irresponsive often
    1 Std.vor 10 Minuten   I neverreally paid much attention to th new forums. Nothing against them, just many other things to do or get distracted with (like bitcoin drama)
    1 Std.vor 9 Minuten   oh yea the bitcoin drama
    15 Min.Gesendet     moving 0.9 sounds great, just inform us when and how we can test, at best in the forum once you are ready.
    with matching to start with we are fine with that, as long as the matching is happening.
    6 Min.Gesendet     since some years now the matching from the alliance funds is only partially done. We could start the giv the alliance funds if the matchings are done. At best every month to have matchings would be great
    4 Min.Gesendet     i guess that would be enough for now, just once a month matching and some sentence once a month how is it going with the client update and what we can do to help.
    Diese Nachricht löschen 3 Min.Gesendet  
  23. Upvote
    Bicknellski reacted to Arcurus in 3 more weeks until initial issuance is complete   
    To get started here a simple solution:
    100 coins if you signup with email and have an invitation
    1000 coins if you sign up and verify with handy (no invitation required)
    1 coin per day for email sign ups
    10 coins per day for handy signups.
    Invitations we give out.
  24. Upvote
    Bicknellski reacted to Skaro in 3 more weeks until initial issuance is complete   
    I think lubricatung of the exchange is a good idea to keep volume steady, lower price volatility, and attract users.
    i think the needs are different now then they were a month ago and what it will be in 3 months. So, a simpler application that can change might be useful. "Sign up and get $1000FRC!", might work well today. 
     
  25. Upvote
    Bicknellski reacted to Arcurus in 3 more weeks until initial issuance is complete   
    I posted here now a draft for a Freicoin roadmap:  https://freicoinalliance.com/topic/560-draft-freicoin-roadmap
    And here a more detailed proposal for the Freicoin giveaway: https://freicoinalliance.com/topic/559-draft-universal-dividend-project
    As always feels welcome to give your feedback! And thx for the great discussion nice to see so much engagement!
×
×
  • Create New...