Leaderboard

So, Acurus wrote that 0.9 is ready for testing and i tried to compile on Lubuntu. First it has no makefile unix to compile, so i coppied it from freicoin 0.8 - it started to compile but give me an error: In file included from net.h:18:0, from alert.cpp:9: util.h:102:2: error: #error missing boost sleep implementation after i uncommented the error in "inline void MilliSleep(int64_t n)" in line 102 in util.h ( the error: No rule to make target obj/bitcoinrpc.o obj/leveldb.o comes up. i had that error earlier, so this is maybe not connected to the up

Hello Freicoiners, currently we plan to make a Freicoin giveaway thorough using the Alliance Forum infrastructure. To speed up the registration without increasing much the danger of fraudulent accounts the following draft for an universal dividend project is invitation based and designed with three different registration levels. The intention of the first level is, that people can easily join through an invitation so that people can get easily some experience with Freicoin. The verification for the second level is more harder to get and receives the full dividend. The third

To use Invitation is just an idea to make sure, that the number of double accounts cannot increase drastically. Maybe it's enough for the beginning to start with phone verification. With the amount of coins: I would prefer to give out the coins on a daily basis. The welcoming coins in my proposal is equal to 100 days.

I found this idea also on another project (circles) that brought up the idea to use the tier2 Kraken accounts to prevent the siblings problem. They need a bank account, an address and a name to verify that you are you. As they did already an airdrop with stellar, they are familiar with the idea. I offered the same thing for solidar to c-cex exchange, their main argument was that the coin was valued too low to make sense of an airdrop. Not quite an argument as we have seen that alcoins can rise 3000% a day in price. But of course this problem is solveable. Though we can - and should - start wit

Very good question. I never did it, but @jtimon said they already started. The configure --with-incompatible-bdb was doing Ok on my server though it gave the error that something was wrong with serialize.h in line 789 during compiling..

Just a question @Rik8119 How much work to port it to a newer Base? Like the freicoin-0.14 branch ?

Hi rik, i managed to bring .configure to run for 0.9 but got stuck while compiling it. Fedde opened now an issue for that on github: https://github.com/freicoin/freicoin/issues/27 Jorge said that he will look into that, so i guess its best to wait until we get some feedback. For bringing .configure to run, i had to follow the instructions of the build manual for unix and install all the dependencies mentioned at the bottom of the file, like the Database library and the boost framework manually. But now i got stuck during compilation. If you want i can help you on unbun

Ok my bad, the installation routine changed to: ./autogen.sh ./configure make I installed autogen, but it is still giving me some errors at ./configure

can we jump to 14 directly without 0.9? 51 Min.vor 19 MinutenGesendet since 0.9 and 0.10 mostly just need testing,why not? but yeah, teh next rebase we plan to do to 0.13 or 0.14 directly

libgmp and libmpfr are specific to bitcoin but we want to reuse things from elements in freicoin if te community wants it Diese Nachricht melden Diese Nachricht löschen 4 Std.vor 4 Stunden I want to help with rebasing to 0.14 and moving the foundation. web out of heroku mostly, probably improving it 4 Std.vor 4 Stunden

Hi Freicoiners, here is a draft for a Freicoin roadmap. As always feel free to give your feedback, Martin Main Goals: - encouraging fair distribution and access to money - encouraging a Frei Economy based on the common good Short term: - Get started with the Freicoin giveaway - having p2p pool work - Having updated Freicoin clients - Restructuring Freiexchange as easy to use wallet (sending coins internally per name or per address) - Moving the Alliance Funds to somebody who wants to take care of it. I would nominate Sk

yes jitmon said 0.9 is long long time ready to be tested.

I favor to get the p2pool code fixed as it would be the easiest way to distribute and for new users to set up that want to run a pool. There is of course other alternavies (nomp, unomp , mpos etc etc) but those are single site pool. I rather see a p2pool network that can work togheter to secure the network itself. Also, the 0.9 code. I see last commit, 25 july 2016. Thats a looong time ago.

After talking with fedde how important it is to fix p2pool i put it up higher in priority. Who ever wants to lay his hand on that feel very welcome. If needed we can also set a bounty for that. After talking with jitmon: 0.9 is ready to be tested and community is more than welcome to test. If needed we can also set a bounty for testing.

As said i wasn't able to conpile myself, but freicoin/0.9 is te branch that needs testing in the bitcoin repo 2 Std.vor 2 Stunden yeah, i forgot we still need to mobe fron 10 to 100% matching... that's important 2 Std.vor 2 Stunden rewarding distributing demurrage in other way than as aubsidy to miners, would be nice, repub

i posted the conversion also in the alliance forum, so that others can read it 16 Min.Gesendet in the longer run many in the community would want to have that some part of the demurrage is distributed to projects. The easiest way to implement it would be to make it like the current foundation. Like 20% to miners and 80% for projects. This part would be great to have distributed regularly through community vote. To start with the voting must not be done at the blockc

I managed to reach jitmon on twitter: for the giveaway, I would prefer that is done through the donation matching program, just another project with 100% matching or something, but that's my opinion 1 Std.vor 18 Minuten rewarding rebases, absolutely, I'm already doing some preparations for 0.14 and 0.13, but mark did a rebase to 0.9 and that's has not been tested or reviwed yet

To get started here a simple solution: 100 coins if you signup with email and have an invitation 1000 coins if you sign up and verify with handy (no invitation required) 1 coin per day for email sign ups 10 coins per day for handy signups. Invitations we give out.

To get started here a simple solution: 100 coins if you signup with email and have an invitation 1000 coins if you sign up and verify with handy (no invitation required) 1 coin per day for email sign ups 10 coins per day for handy signups. Invitations we give out.

I think lubricatung of the exchange is a good idea to keep volume steady, lower price volatility, and attract users. i think the needs are different now then they were a month ago and what it will be in 3 months. So, a simpler application that can change might be useful. "Sign up and get $1000FRC!", might work well today.

I posted here now a draft for a Freicoin roadmap: https://freicoinalliance.com/topic/560-draft-freicoin-roadmap And here a more detailed proposal for the Freicoin giveaway: https://freicoinalliance.com/topic/559-draft-universal-dividend-project As always feels welcome to give your feedback! And thx for the great discussion nice to see so much engagement!

one by one. First lets concentrate in distributing them to people. If they have coins it more easy to bring merchants on board again. Some part of the giveaway we could use to give reduced prices if they use freicoin. In the beginning i guess its good to start with proxy payments in the community.

Okay thanks. Well it seems to me that any discussion of sustainability should probably include at least something about where to spend the coins. There are none. I suppose thats a large part of what the foundation was about, to encourage a community, sellers and buyers. I feel we are forgetting this part of circulation.

yes we need a way to distribute coins other than mining. I would not say take away from the wealthy, i would say we use stuck coins to bring them in circulation again and therefore help both the wealthy and the poor to become wealthy. Because stuckness is good for nobody.

Demurrage is thought to be the start of a cycling of money. Take away from the wealthy, give to the poor and repeat. In this way there can be no bubbles within the monetary system. But to do redistribute it effectively the money has to flow from stakeholders to the people. When it flows to the miners it is sustainable but there is no redistribution because the miners already belong to the wealthy class. So we need an active redistribution (Use the demurrage coins to support the poor). For that we need the demurrage coins to be collected by an organization that then distributes the co

Please define 'sustainable' and 'redistribution' place, for me.

here a link to ALGORAND: The Efficient and Democratic Ledger: https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.01341 from Silvio Micali an turing award winner An here the link to the coinbase article: http://www.coindesk.com/scalable-blockchain-consensus-turing-award-winner-thinks-hes-got-solution

and given the low sell pressure it could be even more if we make the coin sustainable and get a useful redistribution in place..

Is there any way of estimating this: Number of adresses that have become inactive, Number of wallets upgraded, Historical number of codes?

I have alot of cleanup but it gets better and better every day

looks like some 1000% in less than one month. But still very low volume. I really hope that we bring the coin distribution to run

Update 10/9-2017 New design added Minor bugfixes Chapta addon Forgotten password reset Minor improvements Working on some more changes the next few weeks. Any bugs, please report on [email protected] so i can add to the worklist.

news to proof of stake from an turing award winner: http://www.coindesk.com/scalable-blockchain-consensus-turing-award-winner-thinks-hes-got-solution

Hi Sarko, to 1) lol yea the thermodynamics ... it's both the thermodynamics / work securing the chain, and the right to include a transaction to 2) attempt yes, success most likely not long.... by the way, also here dahs pow algorithm sound more promising than script mining. to 3) confirmations currently is pow, therefore see 1) thermodynamics . The balance is known? yes and no. No because it is not known to 100% if the balance stays like it is, because currently longer pow chain can undo the balance. And not necessarily 100% of the nodes agree on the same balance. And yes,

its really sad currently in Bitcoin, it seems that the main mining hardware provider doesnt like core and now tries to make a bitcoin fork with bitcoin unlimited. Its really sad, that they block segwit, which would increase the blocksize 2 fold. It's also really sad, that the core developer still don't have coded or even described an way beyond the current 1 mb limit as promised to the miners. I more and more see no good reason for proof of work other than a coin distribution and the simplicity of it. But the problem is with time one single company will more and more dominate th

Nice post about mining power accumulation in Bitcoin: https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@dantheman/who-really-controls-bitcoin

We are listed on Coinmarketcap https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/freicoin/

There was a mixup in topic link that pointed to the old beta site. It has been changed and beta site has been disabled.

maybe you're putting in the wrong password...

Yeah, at least now in the testing fase. I am doing a few changes during the next days on the display of trades in your "dashboard" so we will see how that work out.

Lovely morning everybody. Progress is going forward. - Fixed changepass - Few more bugs in trading fixed - Design changes (footer etc) - Some security issues has been sorted out We are still in beta, keep that in mind.Do not fire off large qty of coins to the exchange. As always, it's not your bank